When looking up the word 'art'
in a dictionary the definition is:
of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance."
What
particular defines fashion is something that is more then ordinary and most of
the time also beautiful.
However
the question is still asked and discussed if fashion is in fact art, even
though there are many examples that clearly proves that it is.
When
Yves Saint Laurent was the first designer ever having his work displayed in an
art museum (1983) it should have been the beginning of a time when fashion
would be recognized as an art form.
However
it was the first and last time this ever happened at that art museum which was
"The met" in New York.
26
years later some of Saint Laurent’s work was planned to be displayed again,
this time, at “The Grand Palais” in Paris. The thing was that his work
was placed under a heading that said “Glamour” instead of being considered as
an art piece. Even though it was a portrait made by a man that is considered to
be an artist it was not to be considered as art since the piece represented more fashion then
anything else.
Saint Laurent is a designer that has
been influenced by great artists like Van Gogh and Henri Matisse, which you can
see in some of his dresses,
One
example is his jacket which is inspired by Van Gogh’s work “sunflowers”.
He
is using art that is very close to him and the that way he is using paintings
as an inspiration should be considered as an artistic collaboration.
These
garments is a proof of how they are not just a clothing, they are created from an
idea or concept, and the designer who had made these garments, is an artist.
Saint
Laurent's collection which was made with inspirations from all the great
painters like Matisse and Picasso was sold for more then 200 millions, and this
was not because someone wanted to wear these clothes, they were sold because
they were a artistic masterpiece made by a real artist.
So
what would be the different between this and a famous painter ?
why
would Saint Laurent's sewing needle be any less significant than
Picassos painting brush?
If
art is something that is to be considered as something beautiful that
can open people's mind, then there is nothing more like art as fashion.
Postrel, K"Fashion as Art" viewed 11th August 2012
<http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703453804575479902076411376.html>
Sheldon,B "The artful inspirations of Yves Saint Laurent", viewed 12th August 2012
<http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/34445/the-artful-inspirations-of-yves-saint-laurent/ >
<http://dictionary.reference.com/>
No comments:
Post a Comment